wiki home
Online Reference
Dictionary, Encyclopedia & more
by:

photo gallery

teaching:topics:number:axioms

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
teaching:topics:number:axioms [2024/03/14 13:01]
simon
teaching:topics:number:axioms [2024/05/02 12:03]
simon [there are important non-numbers]
Line 44: Line 44:
  
 <wrap #​Order_of_operations />//​Order of operations//​ in arithmetic:​\\ <wrap #​Order_of_operations />//​Order of operations//​ in arithmetic:​\\
-do the brackets first;\\ <wrap indent/>​then any powers;\\ <wrap indent indent/>​then multiply and divide;\\ <wrap indent indent indent/>​then finally plus and minus.+do the brackets first;\\ <wrap indent/>​then any powers;\\ <wrap indent/><​wrap ​indent/>​then multiply and divide;\\ <wrap indent/><​wrap ​indent/><​wrap ​indent/>​then finally plus and minus.
  
 <wrap #​distributive />​**distributive** tells how `+` and `times` work together, `quad 2times(3+4)=(2times3)+(2times4)=14`. This looks much neater (and is easier to read and understand) in our algebra notation where we do not use the `times` symbol... <wrap #​distributive />​**distributive** tells how `+` and `times` work together, `quad 2times(3+4)=(2times3)+(2times4)=14`. This looks much neater (and is easier to read and understand) in our algebra notation where we do not use the `times` symbol...
Line 139: Line 139:
 ====there are important non-numbers==== ====there are important non-numbers====
 When describing numbers [[#What is a number|above]] we saw that dividing by zero was not possible, it did not make sense. Yet in other cases like that we pressed on, we made [[teaching:​topics:​number:​making#​making new numbers|new numbers]] to answer the questions the old ones could not and so made our collections of numbers more complete. We cannot find any solution to When describing numbers [[#What is a number|above]] we saw that dividing by zero was not possible, it did not make sense. Yet in other cases like that we pressed on, we made [[teaching:​topics:​number:​making#​making new numbers|new numbers]] to answer the questions the old ones could not and so made our collections of numbers more complete. We cannot find any solution to
-\(\ x^2=-1\ \) in the //Real Numbers//, so we name a new number that is the solution and call it \(\rm i\). It is not a //Real Number// of course but we find that a whole new kind of number emerges. We call them //Complex Numbers// and find they do behave very nicely as numbers --- following all the rules we talked about here. We also discover many areas where they are very useful, we find many systems where values are naturally expressed as //Complex Numbers//.+\(\ x^2=-1\ \) in the //Real Numbers//, so we name a new number that is the solution and give it a name: \(\rm i\). It is not a //Real Number// of course but we find that a whole new kind of number emerges. We call them //Complex Numbers// and find they do behave very nicely as numbers --- following all the rules we talked about here. We also discover many areas where they are very useful, we find many systems where values are naturally expressed as //Complex Numbers//.
  
 Perhaps, then,  we should simply define a new number, call it \(\large\infty\) and extend our number system even further. The problem is that it does not play by the number rules. If we include it as a number we lose much of what makes numbers so useful and powerful, we cannot use it as a value within our algebra without extra care and work.  Perhaps, then,  we should simply define a new number, call it \(\large\infty\) and extend our number system even further. The problem is that it does not play by the number rules. If we include it as a number we lose much of what makes numbers so useful and powerful, we cannot use it as a value within our algebra without extra care and work. 
teaching/topics/number/axioms.txt ยท Last modified: 2024/05/02 13:04 by simon